03 Dec

Waiting for Putney Swope

Years ago, I saw a movie called Putney Swope. It was about the only black advertising executive in a fancy, Madison Avenue firm. He was elected president of the firm, because all the other voting members thought that they were each are shoo-ins for the job, and Putney was the only candidate who wouldn’t give them any competition. He proceeded to re-make the firm in his own image. He re-named his company “Truth and Soul, Inc.”

Putney had a very firm set of business ethics. He took all kinds of clients, and made hilariously offensive commercials for all of them, but he refused to advertise for any company that sold cigarettes, liquor or toy guns.

I was thinking about Putney Swope because a few days ago I had a discussion with my MBA students about ethics. I asked them if there were any industries they would refuse to join because they were unethical. I emphasized that I was only talking about legal industries, businesses that were condoned by the government, but were still morally or ethically questionable.

I was a little surprised by my students’ responses. Every single one of them was willing to defer their judgment to the government. They all agreed that they would work for any legal industry without any qualms. If it is legal, they agreed, then it must be okay.

“Okay. Let’s suppose you are officials in the British East India Company. You are licensed by the Queen of England to sell opium to the Chinese. You are not breaking any of your country’s laws if you do it. Is it ethical?”

A hush fell over my class, then a murmur. A few of them translated what I had said into Chinese to make sure they all understood.

“No! It is wrong to sell opium. Opium is very bad for the Chinese people.”

“Okay, so can you think of anything else that is wrong, even though it is legal?”

That got them thinking. One young woman said that she would not work for a company that sold diet products, because so many of them are dangerous or fraudulent. Another said that she would not work for a company that sold toy guns, because selling guns to children teaches them to be violent.

I was pleased that my class was able to come up with their own ethical judgments, even if it took them a little prodding to get there. I hope they will be able to hold on to these judgments, and not defer those who are higher up in the chain of command.

At the end of Putney Swope, Putney discovered that his followers at the firm were willing to take money from anyone. They would write copy for cigarette makers, liquor manufacturers and toy gun makers, without giving it a second thought. Rather than let his company fall into the hands of the unworthy, he planted a bomb and blew up the whole place.

It is a cautionary tale to unscrupulous businesspeople everywhere.

2 Comments

  1. 1 December 4, 2006 at 7:48 am
    Permalink

    Hey Emily, I’m beginning to believe more and more (through recent discussions over at my site and conversations here in Suzhou) that this “agree with the government blindly” thing is actually a farce. It’s just a knee-jerk said in groups not to stand out or (more importantly) be singled out.

    It’s not surprising that once you united your students in a way that none of them could disagree with your point, that allowed them to open up a bit. Smart thinking. If I was still teaching many Mainland students, I’d be adding this concept to my teaching plans. Sadly (wait, not sadly), the Taiwanese kids I teach all seem to have their own ideas and aren’t afraid to share them.

  2. 2
    Gena Marshall
    December 8, 2006 at 12:42 am
    Permalink

    Real good discussion. It’s come up in the Marshall family recently, since one of us (unemployed with a new baby and stay-at-home wife) had to decide whether to accept an offer to do marketing for a credit card company. It bothered him that he’d be encouraging people to carry as large a debt load as they could stand. Sometimes life throws you tough choices.

    I’m not as ethically strict as I’d like to be, or as you two are. My knee-jerk answer would be although I dream of sometime having a federal job, my career holy grail, there is no amount of incentives that could get me working for the Justice Dept., or any other agency built on civil forfeiture money.

    Plenty of legal pursuits are so very wrong. Well made point.

Add Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.